表观遗传酶

用于 DNA 甲基化研究的各种流行的表观遗传酶。

类别：DNAAllDNA 纯化质粒纯化清理/DNA 片段纯化自动/高通量DNA 分析RNAAllRNA 提取试剂盒RNA 清理试剂盒RNA 分析试剂盒DNA/RNA 共提取试剂盒DNA/ RNA 共提取表观遗传学所有DNA/RNA 甲基化DNA 羟甲基化DNA 甲基化标准品NGS 文库制备试剂盒ChIP 试剂盒表观遗传酶和试剂微生物组学所有微生物标准品样品收集DNA 分离RNA 分离DNA/RNA 共纯化分析样品收集所有DNA/RNA 屏蔽批量试剂拭子唾液粪便血液尿液环境/载体组织NGS 文库制备试剂盒AllRNA_Sequencing\">RNA 测序Bisulfite_Sequencing\">亚硫酸氢盐测序Microbiome_Sequencing\">微生物组测序E.大肠杆菌所有感受态细胞培养基抗生素和化学品酵母所有DNA分离RNA分离蛋白质分离酵母转化酵母试剂和酶蛋白质和酶酶 全部酶细菌表达菌株用于蛋白质表达的培养基标记蛋白质纯化柱和塑料所有试管裂解管柱96 孔板96 孔旋转板磁珠过滤器储液槽手动均质器设备和仪器全部真空歧管涡旋混合器均质器DNA 聚合酶

从热启动 PCR 到预混液，ZYMO RESEARCH 提供经济实惠的 DNA 聚合酶来增强您的研究。立即尝试一下！

类别：DNAAllDNA 纯化质粒纯化清理/DNA 片段纯化自动/高通量DNA 分析RNAAllRNA 提取试剂盒RNA 清理试剂盒RNA 分析试剂盒DNA/RNA 共提取试剂盒DNA/RNA 共提取表观遗传学AllDNA/RNA 甲基化DNA 羟甲基化DNA 甲基化标准品NGS 文库制备试剂盒ChIP试剂盒表观遗传酶和试剂微生物组学所有微生物标准品样本收集DNA 分离RNA 分离DNA/RNA 共纯化分析样本收集所有DNA/RNA Shield批量试剂拭子唾液粪便血液尿液环境/载体组织NGS 文库制备试剂盒所有RNA_测序\">RNA 测序亚硫酸氢盐_测序\">亚硫酸氢盐测序微生物组_测序\">微生物组测序大肠杆菌所有感受态细胞培养基抗生素和化学品酵母所有DNA分离RNA分离蛋白质分离酵母转化n 酵母试剂和酶蛋白质和酶所有酶细菌表达菌株蛋白质表达的培养基标记蛋白质纯化柱和塑料所有试管裂解管柱96 孔板96 孔旋转板磁珠过滤器储液槽手动均质器设备和仪器所有真空歧管涡旋混合器均质器Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. AbstractMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) specifically differentiate into cardiomyocytes as a potential way to reverse myocardial injury diseases, and uncovering this differentiation mechanism is immensely important. We have previously shown that histone acetylation/methylation and DNA methylation are involved in MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1. These modifications regulate cardiac-specific genes by interacting with each other in the promoter regions of these genes, but the molecular mechanism of these interactions remains unknown. In this study, we found that the key enzymes that regulate GATA4/Nkx2.5 expression are Gcn5/HDAC1, G9A, and DNMT-1. When 伪-methylene-纬-butyrolactone 3 (MB-3) was used to inhibit Gcn5 expression, we observed that the interactions among these key enzymes in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters were blocked, and MSCs could not be induced into cardiomyocytes. Our results indicated that islet-1 could induce Gcn5 binding to GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter regions and induce the interactions among Gcn5, HDAC1, G9A and DNMT-1, which upregulated GATA4/Nkx2.5 expression and promoted MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes. IntroductionMyocardial injury diseases have always been among the highest lethality diseases, primarily due to myocardial cells having no self-renewal ability. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been a hot global research topic because of their multiple differentiation potential1,2,3,4, and they can specifically differentiate into cardiomyocytes5,6,7, which could potentially help cure myocardial injury diseases. Many researchers have successfully induced MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes through different methods8,9,10, but the molecular mechanism of differentiation is not clear, which results in low induction efficiency and limits the clinical application of MSCs. In our previous research, we overexpressed islet-1 and successfully induced MSC differentiation into cardiomyocyte-like cells that possess cardiac electrophysiological properties. Furthermore, we investigated the molecular mechanism and found that histone modifications and DNA methylation are very important for MSC differentiation; these epigenetic modifications interact with each other during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes11,12. However, the specific mechanism of the interactions requires further investigation.Epigenetic modifications exert their function through specific enzymes, and different enzymes modify different sites or have different functions. For example, Gcn5 and CBP/P300 acetylate H3K9/H3K27 sites, Ezh2 methylates H3K27 sites, and Suv39h1 plays a role in H3K9 methylation13,14,15,16,17. DNMT-1 is involved in the maintenance of methylation, and DNMT3a/b functions as a de novo methyltransferase18,19. However, it remains unclear which specific enzymes are involved in islet-1-induced MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes and how these enzymes interact with each other. Continuing our previous study, we will further discuss these two issues in this work.We have confirmed that histone acetylation/methylation and DNA methylation interact with each other in the GATA4 promoter region, coregulate GATA4 expression and induce MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes11. We also found that Gcn5 and DNMT-1 play important roles in regulating GATA4 expression20. In this study, we further investigated the specific enzyme that is involved in regulating GATA4 and Nkx2.5 and the molecular mechanism of the epigenetic interaction of these two cardiac-specific transcript factor promoter regions. This research preliminarily proved the epigenetic mechanism by which MSCs differentiate into cardiomyocytes via islet-1 and reveals the key intervention factor for further research. These findings lay the foundation for increasing MSC differentiation rates and improving the clinical application of MSCs.ResultsIslet-1 could form a complex with Gcn5 during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytesWe transfected a lentiviral vector containing islet-1 into MSCs, and the transfection efficiency was 81% (Supplementary Figure聽1a). Western blot was used to detect islet-1 expression after vector transfection (Supplementary Figure聽1b). Next, we used an islet-1 antibody to pull down proteins bound to islet-1 and a Gcn5 antibody to detect the existence of Gcn5 in the pulled down proteins by Western blot. Co-IP results showed that islet-1 and Gcn5 could form a complex after high islet-1 expression was induced in MSCs (Fig.聽1). This finding confirms our previous results, which indicated that overexpression of islet-1 could affect histone acetylation to induce MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes12.Figure 1Co-IP experiments confirmed that islet-1 and Gcn5 bound together during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1 overexpression. Islet-1 and IgG antibodies were chosen to pull down proteins, and the islet-1 and Gcn5 bands were then detected by Western blot. Gcn5 was detected in proteins pulled down by the islet-1 antibody, which indicated that islet-1 could form a complex with Gcn5.Full size imageGcn5 and HDAC1 are key enzymes that regulate histone acetylation levels in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter regionOur previous study showed that H3K9 acetylation in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter region is associated with the expression of the two genes. In this study, we identified the key enzyme that regulates the acetylation level in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter region. Western blot data indicated that the level of Gcn5 was slightly increased, and that of P300 decreased gradually during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1 (Fig.聽2a,b). ChIP-qPCR was performed to detect the binding level of Gcn5/P300 in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter region. Additionally, the data showed that the binding level of Gcn5 was increased significantly in both the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoter regions, but the binding level of P300 did not change significantly (Fig.聽2d). After islet-1 transfection, the trend of Gcn5 binding in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters was consistent with the expression of GAT4/Nkx2.5, which was detected in our previous study11. Therefore, we propose that Gcn5 is the key HAT that regulates H3K9 acetylation in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter region.Figure 2Identification of the key enzymes involved in H3K9 acetylation during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes. (a) HAT and HDAC bands were detected by Western blot, and the enzymes assessed were Gcn5, P300, HDAC1, HDAC2 and HDAC4. Images were cropped for clarity, and full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplementary Fig.聽1. (b,c) Quantitative analysis of these enzymes. In the process of inducing differentiation, Gcn5 expression slightly increased, P300 and HDAC1 expression decreased, and HDAC2 and HDAC4 expression was not obviously changed. (d,e) The binding levels of these enzymes in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter were detected by ChIP-qPCR; a normal mouse IgG antibody used as a negative control. The input% showed that the main HAT and HDAC binding in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters was Gcn5 and HDAC1, respectively. *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the blank group. The error bars represent the SD of three independent experiments.Full size imageBecause histone acetylation is the result of the balance between HATs and HDACs, HDACs are important for histone acetylation. HDACs restore the positive charge of histones through deacetylation, increasing the attraction between DNA and histones, tightening up the loose nucleosome, and finally suppressing gene expression. Western blot analysis showed that the expression levels of HDAC2 and HDAC4 showed no significant changes, but the expression of HDAC1 gradually decreased after islet-1 transfection (Fig.聽2a鈥揷). Correspondingly, the binding level of HDAC1 in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter decreased, as detected by ChIP-qPCR. However, the binding levels of HDAC2/HCAC4 were low in these regions and did not change during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1 (Fig.聽2e). These results indicate that the key HDAC that regulates H3K9 acetylation in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter region is HDAC1.G9A and DNMT-1 respectively regulated histone methylation and DNA methylation levels in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter regionHistone methylation, as an important histone modification, is involved in inhibiting gene expression and heterochromatin formation. Research has reported that at the H3K9 site, HMTs interact with HATs and affect histone methylation levels in this region21. It has been indicated that histone methylation is a vital part of epigenetic modification interactions. G9A and Suv39h1 are the main enzymes involved in H3K9 methylation, and in this study, we measured these two enzymes to confirm their key role in regulating H3K9 methylation in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter region.Western blot analysis was used to detect G9A/Suv39h1 expression during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1. The results showed that the expression of G9A decreased gradually and was lowest in the LV-islet-1-3w group, but the expression of Suv39h1 did not change after islet-1 transfection compared with that in the blank and control groups (Fig.聽3a,b). ChIP-qPCR indicated that in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter region, the binding level of G9A was higher than that of Suv39h1; furthermore, after islet-1 transfection, the binding level of G9A in both the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoters decreased gradually and was lowest in the LV-islet-1-3w group, which was consistent with the H3K9 methylation level in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter regions detected in our previous study. However, the binding level of Suv39h1 did not obviously change during the period of differentiation (Fig.聽3d). These results suggest that G9A is the key HMT involved in regulating the histone methylation level in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter region during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes.Figure 3Identification of the key enzymes involved in histone methylation and DNA methylation. (a) HMT and DNMT bands were detected by Western blot, and the enzymes assessed were G9A, Suv39h1, DNMT-1, and DNMT-3a. Images were cropped for clarity, and full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplementary Fig.聽2. (b,c) Quantitative analysis of these enzymes. In the process of inducing differentiation, G9A expression decreased gradually, DNMT-3a expression increased, and the other enzymes were not obviously changed. (d,e) The binding levels of these enzymes in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter were detected by ChIP-qPCR; a normal mouse IgG antibody used as a negative control. The input% showed that the main HMT and DNMT binding in GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters was G9A and DNMT-1, respectively. *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the blank group. The error bars represent the SD of three independent experiments.Full size imageDNA methylation is best known for its role in gene silencing. It can alter gene expression without changing a gene鈥檚 base sequence. We used Western blot to detect the expression of DNMTs, and the results showed that the level of DNMT-1 decreased slightly and that the amount of DNMT-3a increased at the 4th week after islet-1 transfection; however, the expression of DNMT-3b was too low to detect (Fig.聽3a鈥揷). Furthermore, our ChIP-qPCR results indicated that the binding level of DNMT-1 in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters was much higher than that of DNMT-3a, and the binding level of DNMT-3b was as low as that of the negative control. In addition, the binding level of DNMT-1 decreased gradually in the GATA4 promoter region during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes but did not change in the Nkx2.5 promoter region (Fig.聽3e). These results suggest that DNMT-1 is the key DNMT responsible for regulating the DNA methylation level in the GATA4 promoter. Additionally, the binding level of DNMT-1 did not change in the Nkx2.5 promoter region, which explains why the methylation level of the Nkx2.5 promoter was not affected by transfection with islet-1, which was found in our previous study11.HP1 associated with the DNA methylation level in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter regionHP1 is a component of heterochromatin that recognizes and binds the methylated H3K9 site, leading to epigenetic repression. DNMT-1 could be recruited to the methylated H3K9 site by HP1 and perform DNA methylation. Therefore, HP1 plays an important role in the interaction of histone methylation and DNA methylation. We found that the expression levels of HP1伪 and HP1尾 were not changed during MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes (Fig.聽4a,b). However, our ChIP-qPCR results showed that the binding levels of HP1伪 and HP1尾 decreased in the GATA4 promoter after islet-1 transfection but did not change in the Nkx2.5 promoter (Fig.聽4c). The ChIP-qPCR results were consistent with the binding levels of DNMTs. We think the reason that the DNA methylation level in the Nkx2.5 promoter was unchanged is that HP1 binding in the Nkx2.5 promoter is stable, which recruits DNMT-1 to this region and maintains DNA methylation.Figure 4The expression of HP1 and its binding level in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters. (a) HP1伪 and HP1尾 bands detected by Western blot. Images were cropped for clarity, and full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplementary Fig.聽3. (b) Quantitative analysis of HP1伪 and HP1尾. In the process of inducing differentiation, HP1伪 and HP1尾 expression was not obviously changed. (c) ChIP-qPCR detection of the binding level of HP1伪 and HP1尾 in GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters. A normal mouse IgG antibody was used as a negative control. The input% showed that both HP1-伪 and HP1-尾 could bind to GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters, but their binding level changed in only the GATA4 promoter. *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the blank group. The error bars represent the SD of three independent experiments.Full size imageGcn5 inhibition does not affect the expression of other key enzymes but affects their binding level in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoterOf all the key enzymes that regulate GATA4/Nkx2.5 expression, Gcn5 is the only enzyme with upregulated expression and an increased binding level during MSC differentiation induced by islet-1. To confirm the interaction among the three epigenetic modifications, we inhibited Gcn5 expression and detected changes in the other key enzymes. We used the Gcn5-specific inhibitor butyrolactone 3 (MB-3) to suppress Gcn5 expression after islet-1 transfection. The Western blot results showed that the expression of Gcn5 was significantly suppressed, but the expression of other key enzymes, HDAC1, G9A DNMT-1 and HP1伪/尾, was not changed in the LV-islet-1鈥?鈥塎B-3 group (Fig.聽5a,b). This result indicates that the expression levels of these key enzymes were not affected by Gcn5 inhibition. ChIP-qPCR detected the binding levels of key enzymes in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters after Gcn5 inhibition. The results showed that compared with that of the LV-islet-1 group, the binding level of Gcn5 was significantly decreased due to MB-3 inhibiting Gcn5 expression; as the response of Gcn5 was blocked, the binding of the other enzymes was all increased in the GATA4 promoter region (Fig.聽5c). In comparison, the binding levels of DNMT-1 and HP1伪/尾 were not affected by Gcn5 inhibition in the Nkx2.5 promoter region (Fig.聽5d). These data suggest that Gcn5 interacts with these other enzymes in the GATA4 promoter region; furthermore, the fact that DNMT-1 and HP1伪/尾 binding to the Nkx2.5 promoter was not affected by Gcn5 inhibition suggests that the interaction of these key enzymes is different in the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoters.Figure 5During MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by Islet-1, the effects of Gcn5 inhibition on other key enzymes were assessed. (a) Western blot was used to detect the expression of the enzymes involved in regulating GATA4/Nkx2.5 after Gcn5 was inhibited by MB-3. The enzymes assessed were Gcn5, HDAC1, G9A, DNMT-1 and HP1. Images were cropped for clarity, and full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplementary Fig.聽4. (b) Quantitative analysis of these enzymes. MB-3 inhibited Gcn5 expression in both the Control鈥?鈥塎B-3 and LV-islet-1鈥?鈥塎B-3 groups but had no effect on the other enzymes. (c,d) ChIP-qPCR results of the binding levels of these enzymes in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters after Gcn5 was inhibited by MB-3 during MSC differentiation. After islet-1 transfection and Gcn5 inhibition, the binding level of the other enzymes in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters did not change compared with those in the blank, control and control鈥?鈥塎B-3 promoters. *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the blank group, #p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the LV-islet-1 group. The error bars represent the SD of three independent experiments.Full size imageHistone acetylation/methylation and DNA methylation in the GATA4 promoter changed after Gcn5 inhibitionWe investigated the effect of Gcn5 inhibition on histone acetylation/methylation and the DNA methylation level in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters. The ChIP-qPCR data showed that compared with those in the LV-islet-1 group, the histone acetylation levels of the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoters were decreased after Gcn5 inhibition, but the histone methylation levels were increased to the levels of the blank and control groups (Fig.聽6a). On the other hand, we detected the DNA methylation level of the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter through MSP. The results indicate that the DNA methylation level of the Nkx2.5 promoter was not affected by Gcn5 inhibition, but in the GATA4 promoter, this level was increased compared with that in the LV-islet-1 group (Fig.聽6b). The BSP results showed that the DNA methylation level of the GATA4 promoter increased to 98% from 88% after Gcn5 inhibition (Fig.聽6c). These results suggest that in the GATA4 promoter region, the inhibition of Gcn5 affected not only the histone acetylation level but also the histone methylation and DNA methylation levels. This is consistent with the binding level of key enzymes in the GATA4 promoter after Gcn5 inhibition. Similarly, the DNA methylation level in the Nkx2.5 promoter did not change after Gcn5 inhibition because Gcn5 inhibition did not affect the binding of HP1伪/尾 and DNMT-1 to the Nkx2.5 promoter.Figure 6During MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1, changes in the levels of H3K9 acetylation/methylation and DNA methylation in the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoters after Gcn5 inhibition were detected. (a) ChIP-qPCR was used to detect H3K9 acetylation and methylation levels in the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoters. The input% showed H3K9 acetylation and methylation levels in the LV-islet-1鈥?鈥塎B-3 group, in contrast to those in the LV-islet-1 group. *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the blank group, #p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the LV-islet-1 group. The error bars represent the SD of three independent experiments. (b) MSP was used to detect the DNA methylation level in the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoters. Two pairs of primers were designed by Methprimer: one set of methylation-specific primers and one set of nonmethylation-specific primers. Images were cropped for clarity, and full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplementary Fig.聽5. (c) Bisulfite sequencing analysis of the GATA4 promoter. Methylated CG (filled circles) and unmethylated CG (open circles) are indicated. The methylation rate of the GATA4 promoter was 88% in the LV-islet-1 group and 98% in the LV-islet-1鈥?鈥塎B-3 group, which were the same as those in the blank and control groups.Full size imageIslet-1 could not induce MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes after Gcn5 inhibitionIn our previous study, islet-1 overexpression promoted MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes by increasing cardiac-specific gene (GATA4/Nkx2.5) expression. In this study, compared with that in the blank and control groups, the expression of GATA4/Nkx2.5 was not changed after Gcn5 inhibition, even when islet-1 was overexpressed (Fig.聽7a). We thought islet-1 could induce MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes because MSCs began to express the cardiac-specific gene cTnT after islet-1 transfection, and the myocardium electrophysiological properties of MSCs may be related to Cx43 expression. However, through immunofluorescence, we found that after Gcn5 inhibition, islet-1 could not induce MSC expression of cTnT and Cx43 (Fig.聽7b). These results suggest that MSCs could not be induced into cardiomyocytes after Gcn5 inhibition, even in the presence of islet-1.Figure 7The effect of Gcn5 inhibition on MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1. (a) FQ-PCR detected the expression levels of GATA4 and Nkx2.5 after Gcn5 was inhibited. GATA4 and Nkx2.5 expression increased after islet-1 transfection, but in the LV-islet-1鈥?鈥塎B-3 group, their expression did not change compared with that in the blank and control groups. *p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the blank group, #p鈥?lt;鈥?.05 compared with the LV-islet-1 group. The error bars represent the SD of three independent experiments. (b) An immunofluorescence assay was used to detect the expression of cTnT and Cx43 (100脳). The fluorescent dye of cTnT was CY3, that of Cx43 was FITC, and DAPI was used for nuclear staining. cTnT express in Cytoplasm, and only expressed in LV-islet-1 group; Cx43 express mainly in Membrane, and expressed much more in LV-islet-1 group than other groups. The block in the lower left corner of a single image is the local amplification (200脳) of the corresponding positions.Full size imageDiscussionEpigenetic manipulation to differentiate MSCs into specialized cells has the potential to serve regenerative purposes. Various studies support the involvement of epigenetic mechanisms through gene expression control, stem cell self-renewal and lineage fate determination22,23. During differentiation into a particular lineage, the specific genes of this lineage undergo active transcription, and the genes responsible for self-renewal and pluripotency are repressed22,24. This on-off mechanism is associated with posttranslational modifications, especially histone acetylation/methylation and promoter DNA methylation. These epigenetic modifications are critical for regulating gene expression, and many studies have focused on one of them. However, in practice, regulating gene expression is extensively coordinated by a network of many factors working together21,25,26,27, which is far beyond the capability of a single epigenetic modification. In the complicated differentiation process, regulating gene expression may be more involved. Different epigenetic modifications probably regulate the same gene through interactions with each other28,29,30. Regarding MSC differentiation, it will be helpful to investigate the mechanism of interactions between epigenetic modifications.Our previous study reported that histone acetylation/methylation and DNA methylation are involved in MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes by regulating GATA4 and Nkx2.5 expression, and these modifications showed obvious interactions with each other in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoter. DNA methylation was not involved in regulating Nkx2.5 expression and did not interact with the other two modifications in the Nkx2.5 promoter11. The interactions among histone acetylation, histone methylation and DNA methylation work in different ways in the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoters, but the details are not completely understood. GATA4 and Nkx2.5 are critical transcription factors in heart development, and elucidating the molecular mechanism will contribute to regulating their expression and help in the development of a method to differentiate MSCs into cardiomyocytes.In this study, we found that the key enzymes of H3K9 acetylation, H3K9 methylation and DNA methylation in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters are Gcn5/HDAC1, G9A and DNMT-1, respectively. During the process of MSC differentiation induced by islet-1, the binding level of Gcn5 in the promoter region of GATA4/Nkx2.5 was obviously increased. On the other hand, the binding levels of G9A, DNMT-1, and HDAC1 were all decreased in the GATA4 promoter, but that of DNMT-1 in the Nkx2.5 promoter was not changed. When the cells were treated with the Gcn5 inhibitor MB-3, the expression levels of other key enzymes (HDAC1, G9A, and DNMT-1) were unaffected, and their binding levels in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters were also unchanged. This indicated that the changes in these key enzymes were not caused by islet-1 but by Gcn5 interacting with them. There is another critical factor involved in the interactions among these key enzymes, HP131,32,33. HP1 can bind to the methylated H3K9 site and recruit DNMT-1 binding to this region; thus, the CpG sites of this region are methylated34,35,36. When MSCs differentiated into cardiomyocytes, the H3K9 methylation level in the GATA4 promoter was decreased, and the binding of HP1 to this region was reduced as well. However, HP1 binding to the Nkx2.5 promoter was unaffected, and even the H3K9 methylation level of this region was decreased. This could be the reason why DNMT-1 binding to the Nkx2.5 promoter was unaffected during MSC differentiation.In our study, when islet-1 was used to induce MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes, Gcn5 expression was slightly increased, and its binding level in the GATA4 promoter was significantly increased. On the other hand, research has reported that Gcn5 and islet-1 could form a complex37. Therefore, we thought that islet-1 could increase GATA4/Nkx2.5 expression by combining with Gcn5 and guiding it to the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters instead of by increasing Gcn5 expression. Based on the above results, we propose an epigenetic modification model of MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1 (Fig.聽8). First, the overexpressed islet-1 could guide more Gcn5 to bind to the GATA4 promoter; then, the H3K9 site of this region may be hyperacetylated. After that, as more Gcn5 binds to the GATA4 promoter, more G9A is replaced, and the H3K9 site becomes hypomethylated. Then, the binding level of HP1 to the GATA4 promoter decreases because of H3K9 hypomethylation in this region, which simultaneously frees DNMT-1 from the GATA4 promoter, and the CpG methylation level of this region decreases. Furthermore, HDAC1 is replaced by Gcn5 from the H3K9 site of the GATA4 promoter. However, according to the literature, DNMT-1 can recruit HDAC1. Therefore, HDAC1 binding to the GATA4 promoter further decreases because DNMT-1 is lost from this region. This phenomenon further increases the H3K9 acetylation level of the GATA4 promoter. Finally, the chromatin structure of the GATA4 promoter region becomes loose, which is conducive to GATA4 expression. The interactions among these key enzymes in the Nkx2.5 promoter is different from those in the GATA4 promoter. HP1 binding to the Nkx2.5 promoter is unaffected by the H3K9 methylation level of this region, which ensures that DNMT-1 binds to this region stably. In the process of induced differentiation, we found significant differences in some parameters, such as the binding levels of Gcn5 and DNMT-1 in the GATA4/Nkx2.5 promoters, which were lost at the 4th week; at this time point, we also found that the protein expression of islet-1 decreased (Supplementary Figure聽2),we were not sure whether these changes were associated with the reduction of Islet-1. We thought that it may be a trend of differentiation progress, and the specific meanings of these changes require our further study.Figure 8The epigenetic modification model of MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes induced by islet-1. Islet-1 guides Gcn5 binding to the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoters, and Gcn5 interacts with G9A, HP1, DNMT-1 and HDAC1. Then, the chromatin of the GATA4 and Nkx2.5 promoter region loosened because of the hyperacetylation of these regions, which is conducive to GATA4 and Nkx2.5 expression.Full size imageOur results showed that when Gcn5 was inhibited, the interactions among these key enzymes were blocked, the expression of GATA4 and Nkx2.5 was repressed, and islet-1 could not induce MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes. These results indicated that the epigenetic modifications and the interactions among these key enzymes are critical for MSC differentiation. However, in practice, the mechanism of MSC differentiation is more complicated. For example, in addition to epigenetic modifications, the stemness of MSCs and the energy metabolism conversion during MSC differentiation are equally important. By studying these two topics, we can thoroughly understand the mechanism of MSC differentiation.MethodsCell culture, lentiviral vector transfection and MB-3 treatmentC3H10T1/2 cells (University of Chicago Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Chicago, IL, USA) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Millipore, USA), lentiviral vectors containing islet-1 or GFP (MOI鈥?鈥?0, GENECHEM, Shanghai, China) and 5鈥壜礸/ml polybrene. The culture medium was replaced after 24鈥塰 of incubation at 37鈥壜癈 in 5% CO2. The cells were divided into three groups: a blank group (C3H10T1/2), a control group (lentiviral vector with GFP), and an LV-islet-1 group (lentiviral vector with islet-1). According to the transfection duration, the LV-islet-1 group was further divided into four subgroups: LV-islet-1-1w, LV-islet-1-2w, LV-islet-1-3w, and LV-islet-1-4w. Butyrolactone 3 (MB-3, 100 碌mol, Santa Cruz, sc-358657) was added to the culture medium after LV-islet-1 or GFP transfection for 24鈥塰; the treatment was applied for 4 weeks, and the cells were defined as the LV-islet-1鈥?鈥塎B-3 group and the control鈥?鈥塎B-3 group. The culture medium of all groups was changed every 2鈥? days.Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assayCo-immunoprecipitation was conducted using a Co-IP assay kit (Merck Millipore, DA, Germany), and the total protein concentrations of the cell lysates were measured with a BCA assay. An anti-islet-1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, UK) antibody was used to pull down islet-1, and an anti-IgG antibody was used as a negative control. Protein collection was analysed by Western blot using an anti-Gcn5 (Epigentek, Farmingdale, NY, USA) antibody to detect its existence in islet-1-recruiting proteins.Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-qPCR assayCells were resuspended in PBS; formaldehyde (1%) was added to the samples to crosslink protein-DNA complexes for 5鈥塵in at room temperature, and glycine was then added to a final concentration of 0.125鈥塎 for 5鈥塵in to terminate the crosslinking. The crosslinked material was fragmented by sonication (UCD-200, Bioruptor), which consisted of 25 cycles of 30鈥塻 each time with 30-s cooldown intervals. ChIP was performed using a ChIP assay kit (Merck Millipore, DA, GER), and the antibodies used are listed in Supplementary Table聽1. The experiment had both a positive control group (precipitated with an anti-RNA polymerase II antibody) and a negative control group (precipitated with normal mouse IgG); 1% of the starting chromatin was used as an input. The primers were designed as follows: Nkx2.5 (forward) 5鈥?ACCGCCTGGGTGATAGAC-3鈥? Nkx2.5 (reverse) 5鈥?CCCTCCCGAGATTGAAGAT-3鈥? GATA4 (forward) 5鈥?GCTACAGGGAGTGATGAGAAG-3鈥? and GATA4 (reverse) 5鈥?CACCAGCCCAGGAGTTTAT-3鈥? The qPCR reaction settings were as follows: step 1, 95鈥壜癈 for 5鈥塵in; step 2, 40鈥塩ycles of 95鈥壜癈 for 15鈥塻 and 60鈥壜癈 for 30鈥塻; step 3, 65鈥壜癈 for 5鈥塻 and 95鈥壜癈 for 0.5鈥塻. To calculate the input%, the following equation was used: Ct(input)鈭?.644; then, the input% was adjusted to 100% as follows: 100*2^ (Adjusted Ct (input) - Ct (IP)).Protein extraction and western blotProteins were extracted from cells using RIPA Reagent (P0013B, Beyotime Biotech, China). Protein samples were mixed with 5脳 buffer and boiled for 5鈥塵in before being loaded onto a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, USA). According to the markers, the membranes were cut into pieces and incubated in 5% nonfat milk-PBST for 1鈥塰. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (Supplementary Table聽1) overnight at 4鈥壜癈 and then washed with PBST 3 times for 10鈥塵in. After that, the membranes were incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody. Positive bands were detected by chemiluminescent reactions (Millipore, USA).Bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) assayDNA was extracted from cells using a DNA extraction kit (AP-MN-MS-GDNA-250, Axygen) and then treated with bisulfite (ZYMO RESEARCHA, California, USA). The PCR products were extracted from the gel (AP-GX-250, Axygen) and ligated into the pMD庐18-T Vector (D101B, TAKARA). Plasmid-transformed DH5伪 bacteria were cultured overnight, and plasmid DNA was isolated (Axygen). At least 10 separate clones were chosen for sequence analysis.Genomic DNA extraction and methylation-specific PCR (MSP)Genomic DNA was collected using a genomic DNA purification kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) and modified using an EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit (ZYMO RESEARCHA, California, USA). The primers for methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR) were designed as follows: methylation-specific primers, Nkx2.5 (forward) 5鈥?ATTAGGTGACGTAGAATTGTTCGTC-3鈥? Nkx2.5 (reverse) 5鈥?CGCCTCTCTACCCTAAATATAACG-3鈥? GATA4 (forward) 5鈥?GGGTTTATAGGTATTGACGTCGA-3鈥? and GATA4 (reverse) 5鈥?GATAAAAACTACAAAACGCCGAA-3鈥? The nonmethylation-specific primers were Nkx2.5 (forward) primer 5鈥?TAGGTGATGTAGAATTGTTTGTTGT-3鈥? Nkx2.5 (reverse) primer 5鈥?CCACCTCTCTACCCTAAATATAACAC-3鈥? GATA4 (forward) 5鈥?AGGGTTTATAGGTATTGATGTTGA-3鈥? and GATA4 (reverse) 5鈥?CCAATAAAAACTACAAAACACCAAA-3鈥? The PCR products were run on a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and evaluated under UV light.Total RNA extraction and real-time PCRThe total RNA samples were collected using an RNA extraction kit (RP120; BioTeke) and transformed into cDNA using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Dalian, Liaoning, China). Then, the resulting cDNA samples were amplified with gene-specific primers and a SYBR Green dye kit (Takara, Dalian, Liaoning, China). Primers were designed as follows: Nkx2.5 (forward) 5鈥?GAGCCTGGTAGGGAAAGAGC-3鈥? Nkx2.5 (reverse) 5鈥?GGTGGGTGTGAAATCTGAGG-3鈥? GATA4 (forward) 5鈥?GACTACCACCACCACGCTGT-3鈥? and GATA4 (reverse) 5鈥?ATTCAGGTTCTTGGGCTTCC-3鈥?ImmunofluorescenceThe cells were fixed in 4鈥壜癈 acetone for 15鈥塵in and blocked with goat serum (1:20). Then, primary anti-cardiac troponin T monoclonal (1:400, Abcam) and anti-connexin 43 polyclonal (1:100, Abcam) antibodies were added for overnight incubation at 4鈥壜癈. Next, secondary antibodies (1:150; CoWin Bioscience, Beijing, China) conjugated to Cy3 were added and incubated for 1鈥塰 at 37鈥壜癈. DAPI was then added for 3鈥塵in. Images were acquired under a fluorescence microscope (BX51; Olympus).Statistical analysisEach experiment was repeated at least three times. All data are expressed as the means鈥壜扁€塖D, while statistical evaluations were performed using independent samples and t-tests, continuity correction chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA. SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A value of P鈥?lt;鈥?.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses. All data used during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. References1.Bianco, P., Robey, P. G. Simmons, P. J. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell. Stem. Cell. 2(4), 313鈥? (2008).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 2.Kumar, S. L. S. D. Mok, S. PL. Cellular Reparative Mechanisms of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Retinal Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18(8), 1406, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081406 (2017).CAS聽 Article聽 PubMed Central聽 Google Scholar聽 3.Fahy, N., Alini, M. Stoddart, M. J. Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cells: Implications for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Orthop. Res. Jan. 36(1), 52鈥?3 (2018). Google Scholar聽 4.EEM, C. et al. Knockdown of SIRT7 enhances the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells partly via activation of the Wnt/尾-catenin signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 8(9), e3042, https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2017.429 (2017).Article聽 Google Scholar聽 5.Chou, S. H. et al. Mesenchymal stem cell insights: prospects in cardiovascular therapy. Cell Transplant. 23(4鈥?), 513鈥?9 (2014).Article聽 Google Scholar聽 6.Majka, M., Su艂kowski, M., Badyra, B. Musia艂ek, P. Concise Review: Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cardiovascular Regeneration: Emerging Research Directions and Clinical Applications. Stem Cell Transl. Med. 6(10), 1859鈥?867 (2017).Article聽 Google Scholar聽 7.Khajeniazi, S., Solati, M., Yazdani, Y., Soleimani, M. Kianmehr, A. Synergistic induction of cardiomyocyte differentiation from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by interleukin 1尾 and 5-azacytidine. Biol. Chem. 397(12), 1355鈥?364 (2016).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 8.Zhang, Y., Chu, Y., Shen, W. Dou, Z. Effect of 5-azacytidine induction duration on differentiation of human first-trimester fetal mesenchymal stem cells towards cardiomyocyte-like cells. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 9(6), 943鈥? (2009).Article聽 Google Scholar聽 9.Yang, G. et al. Trichostatin a promotes cardiomyocyte differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells after 5-azacytidine induction or during coculture with neonatal cardiomyocytes via a mechanism independent of histone deacetylase inhibition. Cell Transplant. 21(5), 985鈥?6 (2012).Article聽 Google Scholar聽 10.Huang, Y. S. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from rat olfactory bulbs can differentiate into cells with cardiomyocyte characteristics. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 9(12), E191鈥?01 (2015).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 11.Xu, H. et al. Histone modifications interact with DNA methylation at the GATA4 promoter during differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into cardiomyocyte-like cells. Cell Prolif. Jun. 49(3), 315鈥?9 (2016).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 12.Yin, N. et al. Islet-1 promotes the cardiac-specific differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through the regulation of histone acetylation. Int. J. Mol. Med. 33(5), 1075鈥?2 (2014).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 13.Huang, B., Li, G. Jiang, X. H. Fate determination in mesenchymal stem cells: a perspective from histone-modifying enzymes. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 6, 35 (2015).Article聽 Google Scholar聽 14.Marmorstein, R. Trievel, R. C. Histone modifying enzymes: structures, mechanisms, and specificities. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1789(1), 58鈥?8 (2009).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 15.Wang, M., Yu, Q., Wang, L. Gu, H. Distinct patterns of histone modifications at cardiac-specific gene promoters between cardiac stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 304(11), C1080鈥?0 (2013).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 16.Wei, Y. et al. CDK1-dependent phosphorylation of EZH2 suppresses methylation of H3K27 and promotes osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 13(1), 87鈥?4 (2011).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 17.Aoyama, T. et al. Histone modifiers, YY1 and p300, regulate the expression of cartilage-specific gene, chondromodulin-I, in mesenchymal stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285(39), 29842鈥?0 (2010).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 18.Bird, A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes. Dev. 16(1), 6鈥?1 (2002).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 19.Moore, L. D., Le, T. Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 38(1), 23鈥?8 (2013).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 20.Yi, Q. et al. Islet-1 induces the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into cardiomyocyte-like cells through the regulation of Gcn5 and DNMT-1. Mol. Med. Rep. May. 15(5), 2511鈥?520 (2017).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 21.Wu, L. P. et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor depsipeptide activates silenced genes through decreasing both CpG and H3K9 methylation on the promoter. Mol. Cell Biol. 28(10), 3219鈥?5 (2008).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 22.Saidi, N. et al. Dynamic changes of epigenetic signatures during chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 89, 719鈥?31 (2017).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 23.Vincent, A. Van Seuningen, I. Epigenetics, stem cells and epithelial cell fate. Differentiation. 78(2-3), 99鈥?07 (2009).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 24.Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 128(4), 693鈥?05 (2007).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 25.Qiu, J. Epigenetics: unfinished symphony. Nature. 441(7090), 143鈥? (2006).ADS聽 CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 26.Berger, S. L. The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription. Nature. 447(7143), 407鈥?2 (2007).ADS聽 CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 27.Fuks, F. DNA methylation and histone modifications: teaming up to silence genes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15(5), 490鈥? (2005).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 28.Ghoshal, K. et al. Inhibitors of histone deacetylase and DNA methyltransferase synergistically activate the methylated metallothionein I promoter by activating the transcription factor MTF-1 and forming an open chromatin structure. Mol. Cell Biol. 22(23), 8302鈥?9 (2002).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 29.Bachman, K. E. et al. Histone modifications and silencing prior to DNA methylation of a tumor suppressor gene. Cancer Cell. 3(1), 89鈥?5 (2003).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 30.Strunnikova, M. et al. Chromatin inactivation precedes de novo DNA methylation during the progressive epigenetic silencing of the RASSF1A promoter. Mol. Cell Biol. 25(10), 3923鈥?3 (2005).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 31.Lehnertz, B. et al. Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr. Biol. 13(14), 1192鈥?00 (2003).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 32.Bannister, A. J. et al. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature. 410(6824), 120鈥? (2001).ADS聽 CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 33.Lachner, M., O鈥機arroll, D., Rea, S., Mechtler, K. Jenuwein, T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature. 410(6824), 116鈥?0 (2001).ADS聽 CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 34.Smallwood, A., Est猫ve, P. O., Pradhan, S. Carey, M. Functional cooperation between HP1 and DNMT1 mediates gene silencing. Genes. Dev. 21(10), 1169鈥?8 (2007).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 35.Fuks, F., Hurd, P. J., Deplus, R. Kouzarides, T. The DNA methyltransferases associate with HP1 and the SUV39H1 histone methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 31(9), 2305鈥?2 (2003).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 36.Ma, Y. et al. DNA CpG hypomethylation induces heterochromatin reorganization involving the histone variant macroH2A. J. Cell Sci. 118(Pt 8), 1607鈥?6 (2005).CAS聽 Article聽 Google Scholar聽 37.Na Zhou et al. Screening Differentiation Related GCN5 Recruitment Proteins during Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells into Cardiac Like Myocytes. Chinese. J. Cell Biol. 32(01), 61鈥?8 (2010). Google Scholar聽 Download referencesAcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 81670270 Grant Number 81700250), and Chongqing Science Technology Commission (Grant Number cstc2016jcyjA0420).Author informationAuthor notesThese authors contributed equally: Hao Xu and Qin Zhou.AffiliationsDepartment of Clinical Laboratory; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders (Chongqing); China International Science and Technology Cooperation base of Child development and Critical Disorders; Children鈥檚 Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. ChinaHao XuDepartment of Pediatric Research Institute, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders (Chongqing); China International Science and Technology Cooperation base of Child development and Critical Disorders; Children鈥檚 Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. ChinaQin Zhou,聽Qin Yi,聽Bin Tan,聽Xueni Chen,聽Yue Wang聽 聽Jing ZhuDepartment of Cardiovascular (Internal Medicine), Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders (Chongqing); China International Science and Technology Cooperation base of Child development and Critical Disorders; Children鈥檚 Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, P.R. ChinaJie TianChongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, P.R. ChinaQin Zhou,聽Qin Yi,聽Bin Tan,聽Xueni Chen,聽Yue Wang聽 聽Jing ZhuChengdu Women鈥檚 and Children鈥檚 Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, P.R. ChinaXia YuAuthorsHao XuView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarQin ZhouView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarQin YiView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarBin TanView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarJie TianView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarXueni ChenView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarYue WangView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarXia YuView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarJing ZhuView author publicationsYou can also search for this author in PubMed聽Google ScholarContributionsJing Zhu and Jie Tian conceived and designed the project. Hao Xu and Qin Zhou carried out the experiments and drafted the manuscript, Bin Tan contributed to edit the figures. Qin Yi performed statistical analyses. Xueni Chen carried out the sample collection. Yue Wang and Xia Yu contributed to cells culture, reagent procurement and management.Corresponding authorCorrespondence to Jing Zhu.Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional informationPublisher鈥檚 note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Supplementary information supplementary information.Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article鈥檚 Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article鈥檚 Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Reprints and PermissionsAbout this articleCite this articleXu, H., Zhou, Q., Yi, Q. et al. Islet-1 synergizes with Gcn5 to promote MSC differentiation into cardiomyocytes. Sci Rep 10, 1817 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58387-8Download citationReceived: 12 June 2019Accepted: 22 November 2019Published: 04 February 2020DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58387-8 CommentsBy submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter 鈥?what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.